The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy

Scovronick, N., Budolfson, M., Dennig, F., Errickson, F., Fleurbaey, M., Peng, W., Socolow, R.H., Spears, D., et al. (2019). The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy. Nature Communications 10 e2095. 10.1038/s41467-019-09499-x.

Preview	Text s41467-019-09499-x.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (828kB) | Preview
	Archive 41467_2019_9499_MOESM1_ESM.zip - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB)

Abstract

The health co-benefits of CO2 mitigation can provide a strong incentive for climate policy through reductions in air pollutant emissions that occur when targeting shared sources. However, reducing air pollutant emissions may also have an important co-harm, as the aerosols they form produce net cooling overall. Nevertheless, aerosol impacts have not been fully incorporated into cost-benefit modeling that estimates how much the world should optimally mitigate. Here we find that when both co-benefits and co-harms are taken fully into account, optimal climate policy results in immediate net benefits globally, overturning previous findings from cost-benefit models that omit these effects. The global health benefits from climate policy could reach trillions of dollars annually, but will importantly depend on the air quality policies that nations adopt independently of climate change. Depending on how society values better health, economically optimal levels of mitigation may be consistent with a target of 2 °C or lower.

Actions (login required)

View Item