Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages

McCollum, D.L., Gomez Echeverri, L., Busch, S., Pachauri, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-3178, Parkinson, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-5198, Rogelj, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-9061, Krey, V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-3515, Minx, J.C., Nilsson, M., Stevance, A.-S., & Riahi, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-3498 (2018). Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environmental Research Letters 13 (3) 033006. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3.

Preview	Text McCollum_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_033006.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB) | Preview
Preview	Text ERL_033006_SD.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (187kB) | Preview
	Other (Interaction Table) erl_033006_SD_SDG interaction Table.xlsx - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (537kB)

Abstract

The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide guide-posts to society as it attempts to respond to an array of pressing challenges. One of these challenges is energy; thus, the SDGs have become paramount for energy policy-making. Yet, while governments throughout the world have already declared the SDGs to be 'integrated and indivisible', there are still knowledge gaps surrounding how the interactions between the energy SDG targets and those of the non-energy-focused SDGs might play out in different contexts. In this review, we report on a large-scale assessment of the relevant energy literature, which we conducted to better our understanding of key energy-related interactions between SDGs, as well as their context-dependencies (relating to time, geography, governance, technology, and directionality). By (i) evaluating the nature and strength of the interactions identified, (ii) indicating the robustness of the evidence base, the agreement of that evidence, and our confidence in it, and (iii) highlighting critical areas where better understanding is needed or context dependencies should be considered, our review points to potential ways forward for both the policy making and scientific communities. First, we find that positive interactions between the SDGs outweigh the negative ones, both in number and magnitude. Second, of relevance for the scientific community, in order to fill knowledge gaps in critical areas, there is an urgent need for interdisciplinary research geared toward developing new data, scientific tools, and fresh perspectives. Third, of relevance for policy-making, wider efforts to promote policy coherence and integrated assessments are required to address potential policy spillovers across sectors, sustainability domains, and geographic and temporal boundaries. The task of conducting comprehensive science-to-policy assessments covering all SDGs, such as for the UN's Global Sustainable Development Report, remains manageable pending the availability of systematic reviews focusing on a limited number of SDG dimensions in each case.

Actions (login required)

View Item