<mets:mets OBJID="eprint_13456" LABEL="Eprints Item" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATE="2024-01-01T21:02:29Z"><mets:agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION"><mets:name>IIASA Repository</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_eprint_13456_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Appraising agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation potentials: effects of alternative assumptions</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">U.A.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Schneider</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">B.A.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">McCarl</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>There is interest in society in general and in the agricultural and forestry sectors concerning a land-based role in greenhouse gas mitigation reduction. Numerous studies have estimated the potential supply schedules at which agriculture and forestry could produce greenhouse gas offsets. However, such studies vary widely in critical assumptions regarding economic market adjustments, allowed scope of mitigation alternatives, and region of focus. Here, we examine the effects of using different assumptions on the total emission mitigation supply curve from agriculture and forestry in the United States. To do this we employ the U.S.-based Agricultural Sector and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Model and find that variations in such factors can have profound effects on the results. Differences between commonly employed methods shift economic mitigation potentials from -55 to + 85%. The bias is stronger at higher carbon prices due to afforestation and energy crop plantations that reduce supply of traditional commodities. Lower carbon prices promote management changes with smaller impacts on commodity supply.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2006-11</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_eprint_13456"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_eprint_13456_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own author:</strong>
In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic
metadata, I grant IIASA Repository the right to store
them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line.
I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I
understand that IIASA Repository does not assume any
responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these
files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their
copyright on the title page of their work.)</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its
author:</strong> I hereby declare that the collection of files and
associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at
IIASA Repository) is in the public domain. If this is
not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright
that distributing these files or metadata may entail.</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these
terms.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div DMDID="DMD_eprint_13456_mods" ADMID="TMD_eprint_13456"></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>