<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Bayesian Variable Selection in Spatial Autoregressive Models</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">P.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Piribauer</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Crespo Cuaresma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This paper compares the performance of Bayesian variable selection approaches for spatial autoregressive models. It presents two alternative approaches that can be implemented using Gibbs sampling methods in a straightforward way and which allow one to deal with the problem of model uncertainty in spatial autoregressive models in a flexible and computationally efficient way. A simulation study shows that the variable selection approaches tend to outperform existing Bayesian model averaging techniques in terms of both in-sample predictive performance and computational efficiency. The alternative approaches are compared in an empirical application using data on economic growth for European NUTS-2 regions.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2016-10-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Routledge</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>