<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Robustness of water resources systems</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">T.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Hashimoto</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">D.P.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Loucks</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J.R.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Stedinger</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>When water resource systems investments are made there is little assurance that the predicted performance will coincide with the actual performance. Robustness is proposed as a measure of the likelihood that the actual cost of a proposed project will not exceed some fraction of the minimum possible cost of a system designed for the actual conditions that occur in the future. The robustness criterion is illustrated by its application to the planning of water supply systems in southwestern Sweden.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">1982-02</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Wiley</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>