@article{iiasa14462,
          volume = {22},
          number = {2},
           month = {March},
           title = {Time-Continuous Phosphorus Flows in the Indian Agri-Food Sector: Long-Term Drivers and Management Options},
       publisher = {Wiley},
            year = {2017},
         journal = {Journal of Industrial Ecology},
             doi = {10.1111/jiec.12560},
           pages = {406--421},
             url = {https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14462/},
            issn = {10881980},
        abstract = {Phosphorus (P) is a major agricultural nutrient and, in its mineable form, a potentially scarce resource. Countries with limited physical access to P should hence develop an effective national P governance. This requires analyses of trends and variations in P flows and stocks over time. Here, we present a long-term P flow analysis for the Indian agri-food sector from 1988 to 2011. Major P flows are imports of mineral P, fertilizer application, and uptake of animal fodder. The mineral P import dependency ratio is constant at around 93\%. On average, 20\% of P inputs to soils are lost through erosion. Key drivers of changes in P flows include population growth, dietary change, and agricultural intensification. To reduce its P fertilizer import dependence, India could, for example, substitute up to 19\% of the presently applied mineral P if manure used as a household fuel were recycled, and up to 21\% if P was fully recovered from wastewater and household waste. Comparing selected indicators for P use in agriculture with China and the European Union (EU) reveals that there are structural similarities, such as increasing fertilizer application rates and P accumulation in soils, with the first but large differences compared to the latter. The analyses highlight that in contrast to static indicators, the time-continuous tracking of P flows provides substantial advantages, such as the identification of long-term trends, drivers, and intervention options for sustainable P management, given that it allows for the interpretation of present indicators in the context of past trends and legacies.},
          author = {Keil, L. and Folberth, C. and Jedelhauser, M. and Binder, C. R.}
}