<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">R.R.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Nelson</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Economists long have employed evolutionary language and metaphors to characterize economic change, but until recently have largely eschewed the expression of explicit evolutionary theories. Over the last decade, however, a number of explicit evolutionary theories have been developed by economists, and other social scientists. This essay discusses the general analytic art form, and summarizes and discusses a number of the particular models. In the light of those examples, it evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of explicit evolutionary theorizing as an approach to understanding economic change.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">1995</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>American Economic Association</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>