Standardizing selection strengths to study selection in the wild: A critical comparison and suggestions for the future

Matsumura, S., Arlinghaus, R., & Dieckmann, U. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-0393 (2012). Standardizing selection strengths to study selection in the wild: A critical comparison and suggestions for the future. IIASA Interim Report. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria: IR-12-051

Preview

Text IR-12-051.pdf Download (538kB) | Preview

Abstract

We critically review the main approaches for standardizing and comparing selection differentials and gradients among traits, populations, and species and assess their differential merits. In particular, we explain why the most widespread approach to standardizing selection, which measures selection differentials in units of a trait's phenotypic standard deviation, is less appropriate for characterizing strengths of natural selection in wild populations. In contrast, an alternative standardization approach, which uses a trait's phenotypic mean in addition to its standard deviation, results in another dimensionless measure - the mean-standardized selection gradient. This measure offers some key benefits over alternative approaches - such as ease of interpretation, independence of a trait's variance, and the natural interfacing of ecological and evolutionary dynamics - and yet remains rarely used by evolutionary biologists. We explain how the more routine application of this measure will facilitate comparisons of selection strengths in the wild among traits, populations, and species.

Actions (login required)

View Item