A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or beaking climate targets - The AMPERE study staged accession scenarios for climate policy"

Kriegler, E., Riahi, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-3498, Schwanitz, V.J., Rao, S., Johnson, N., Krey, V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-3515, & McCollum, D. (2015). A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or beaking climate targets - The AMPERE study staged accession scenarios for climate policy". Technological Forecasting and Social Change 99 273-276. 10.1016/.techfore.2015.07.011.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We provide a rejoinder to a review (Rosen, 2015) of our original article "Making or breaking climate targets - the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy" (Kriegler et al., 2015a). We have a substantial disagreement with the content of the review, and feel that it is plagued by a number of misconceptions about the nature of the AMPERE study and the integrated assessment modeling approach employed by it. We therefore see this rejoinder as an opportunity to clarify these misconceptions and advance the debate by providing aclearer understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately the value of integrated assessment.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	integrated assessment modeling; model comparison; mitigation costs; peer review
Research Programs:	Energy (ENE) Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM)
Bibliographic Reference:	Technologcal Forecasting and Social Change; 99:273-276 [October 2015] (Published online 5 August 2015)
Depositing User:	IIASA Import
Date Deposited:	15 Jan 2016 08:52
Last Modified:	27 Aug 2021 17:24
URI:	https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/11350

Actions (login required)

View Item