The co-production of risk from a natural hazards perspective: science and policy interaction for landslide risk management in Italy

Scolobig, A. & Pelling, M. (2015). The co-production of risk from a natural hazards perspective: science and policy interaction for landslide risk management in Italy. Natural Hazards 81 (S1) 7-25. 10.1007/s11069-015-1702-1.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Despite continuing technological advancement in hazard and vulnerability assessment, risk modelling and hazard mitigation techniques, losses to disasters associated with natural hazards continue and in some cases are increasing across Europe and worldwide. This paper focuses on the need to bridge the gap between technical solutions and the sociopolitical contexts in which these are produced, to better understand and create more effective risk management regimes. We do so with application of the science–policy co-production frame to landslide risk management in Italy. The methodology deployed included a desk study informed by semi-structured interviews carried out with selected key stakeholders at national, regional and municipal level. We propose a normative and analytical framework for transferring co-production into natural hazard research by presenting a matrix identifying four contexts within which co-production may unfold. The matrix is based on two axes, which distinguish between innovation and its absence in science and policy domains. We examine several examples of co-production, such as the water–soil integrated approach to risk management or the implementation of hazard/risk assessment. The results highlight that the insulation of science from the institutional context within which knowledge is produced and used is a very problematic issue. This often hinders the implementation of desirable policies and undermines the effectiveness of interventions. Moreover, innovation in science and policy does not automatically result in successful solutions for landslide risk management. Finally, results confirm the utility of co-production but also highlight methodological challenges associated with the introduction of this new conceptual paradigm into the well-structured communities of scientists and policy-makers.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Science–policy co-production Landslides Boundary organizations Public involvement Disaster management
Research Programs:	Risk & Resilience (RISK) Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV)
Depositing User:	Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited:	10 Feb 2016 13:55
Last Modified:	27 Aug 2021 17:25
URI:	https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/11899

Actions (login required)

View Item