N2O Release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels

Crutzen, P.J., Mosier, A.R., Smith, K.A., & Winiwarter, W. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-1496 (2016). N2O Release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. In: Paul J. Crutzen: A Pioneer on Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Change in the Anthropocene. pp. 227-238 Glan, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-27460-7 10.1007/978-3-319-27460-7_12.

[thumbnail of First published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8 (2008): 389–395]
Text (First published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8 (2008): 389–395)
acp-8-389-2008.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (281kB) | Preview


The relationship, on a global basis, between the amount of N fixed by chemical, biological or atmospheric processes entering the terrestrial biosphere, and the total emission of nitrous oxide (N2O), has been re-examined, using known global atmospheric removal rates and concentration growth of N2O as a proxy for overall emissions. For both the pre-industrial period and in recent times, after taking into account the large-scale changes in synthetic N fertiliser production, we find an overall conversion factor of 3–5 % from newly fixed N to N2O–N. We assume the same factor to be valid for biofuel production systems. It is covered only in part by the default conversion factor for ‘direct’ emissions from agricultural crop lands (1 %) estimated by IPCC (2006), and the default factors for the ‘indirect’ emissions (following volalilization/deposition and leaching/runoff of N: 0.35–0.45 %) cited therein. However, as we show in the paper, when additional emissions included in the IPCC methodology, e.g. those from livestock production, are included, the total may not be inconsistent with that given by our “top-down” method. When the extra N2O emission from biofuel production is calculated in “CO2-equivalent” global warming terms, and compared with the quasi-cooling effect of ‘saving’ emissions of fossil fuel derived CO2, the outcome is that the production of commonly used biofuels, such as biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), depending on N fertilizer uptake efficiency by the plants, can contribute as much or more to global warming by N2O emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Crops with less N demand, such as grasses and woody coppice species, have more favourable climate impacts. This analysis only considers the conversion of biomass to biofuel. It does not take into account the use of fossil fuel on the farms and for fertilizer and pesticide production, but it also neglects the production of useful co-products. Both factors partially compensate each other. This needs to be analyzed in a full life cycle assessment.

Item Type: Book Section
Additional Information: The text was originally published as: W. Asman, C. Brenninkmeijer, R. Cicerone, L. Ganzeveld, B. Hermann, M. Lawrence, A. Leip, O. Oenema, G. Pearman, V. Ramanathan, H. Rodhe and E. Smeets for discussions and comments. Edited by R. Cohen. The text was first published as: “N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels”, in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8 (2008): 389–395. The copyright rests with the authors under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License who granted permission for its inclusion in this volume.
Research Programs: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases (AIR)
Depositing User: Romeo Molina
Date Deposited: 01 Jun 2016 09:50
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2021 17:27
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/13272

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item