Folberth, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-5238, Skalsky, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-6897, Moltchanova, E., Balkovic, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-4931, Azevedo, L., Obersteiner, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-2769, & van der Velde, M. (2016). Uncertainty in soil data can outweigh climate impact signals in crop yield simulations. Nature Communications 7 art.no.11872. 10.1038/ncomms11872.
Preview |
Text
ncomms11872.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (4MB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
ncomms11872-s1.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) are increasingly used for agro-environmental assessments and estimates of climate change impacts on food production. Recently, the influence of climate data and weather variability on GGCM outcomes has come under detailed scrutiny, unlike the influence of soil data. Here we compare yield variability caused by the soil type selected for GGCM simulations to weather-induced yield variability. Without fertilizer application, soil-type-related yield variability generally outweighs the simulated inter-annual variability in yield due to weather. Increasing applications of fertilizer and irrigation reduce this variability until it is practically negligible. Importantly, estimated climate change effects on yield can be either negative or positive depending on the chosen soil type. Soils thus have the capacity to either buffer or amplify these impacts. Our findings call for improvements in soil data available for crop modelling and more explicit accounting for soil variability in GGCM simulations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Research Programs: | Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM) |
Depositing User: | Michaela Rossini |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jun 2016 09:08 |
Last Modified: | 27 Aug 2021 17:27 |
URI: | https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/13305 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |