Second-Best Renewable Subsidies to De-carbonize the Economy: Commitment and the Green Paradox

Rezai, A. & van der Ploeg, F. (2017). Second-Best Renewable Subsidies to De-carbonize the Economy: Commitment and the Green Paradox. Environmental and Resource Economics 66 (3) 409-434. 10.1007/s10640-016-0086-3.

[thumbnail of s10640-016-0086-3.pdf]
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (900kB) | Preview


Climate change must deal with two market failures: global warming and learning by doing in renewable energy production. The first-best policy consists of an aggressive renewables subsidy in the near term and a gradually rising and falling carbon tax. Given that global carbon taxes remain elusive, policy makers might have to rely on a second-best subsidy only. With credible commitment the second-best subsidy is higher than the social benefit of learning to cut the transition time and peak warming close to first-best levels at the cost of higher fossil fuel use in the short run (weak Green Paradox). Without commitment the second-best subsidy is set to the social benefit of learning. It generates smaller weak Green Paradox effects, but the transition to the carbon-free takes longer and cumulative carbon emissions are higher. Under first best and second best with pre-commitment peak warming is 2.1–2.3 ∘C, under second best without commitment 3.5 ∘C, and without any policy 5.1 ∘C above pre-industrial levels. Not being able to commit yields a welfare loss of 95% of initial GDP compared to first best. Being able to commit brings this figure down to 7%.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: First best; Second best; Commitment; Markov-perfect; Ramsey growth; Carbon tax; Renewables subsidy; Learning by doing; Directed technical change
Research Programs: Risk & Resilience (RISK)
Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV)
Depositing User: Romeo Molina
Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2016 09:49
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2021 17:41

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item