Can Forest Management Practices Counteract Species Loss Arising from Increasing European Demand for Forest Biomass under Climate Mitigation Scenarios?

Rosa, F., Di Fulvio, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-6360, Lauri, P., Felton, A., Forsell, N., Pfister, S., & Hellweg, S. (2023). Can Forest Management Practices Counteract Species Loss Arising from Increasing European Demand for Forest Biomass under Climate Mitigation Scenarios? Environmental Science & Technology 57 (5) 2149-2161. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07867.

[thumbnail of acs.est.2c07867.pdf]
Preview
Text
acs.est.2c07867.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Forests are home to many species and provide biomass for material and energy. Here, we modeled the potential global species extinction risk from future scenarios of climate mitigation and EU28 forest management. We considered the continuation of current practices, the adoption of closer-to-nature management (low-intensity practices), and set-asides (conversion to unharvested forestland) on portions of EU28 forestland under two climate mitigation pathways as well as the consequences for the wood trade. Expanding set-aside to more than 25% of EU28 currently managed forestland by 2100 increased the global extinction risk compared to the continuation of current practices. This outcome stems from a projected increase in EU forest biomass imports, partially from biodiversity-vulnerable regions to compensate for a decrease in domestic harvest. Conversely, closer-to-nature management on up to 37.5% of EU28 forestland lowered extinction risks. Increasing the internal production and partially sourcing imported biomass from low-intensity managed areas lowered the species extinction footprint even further. However, low-intensity practices could not entirely compensate for the increased extinction risk under a high climate mitigation scenario with greater demand for lignocellulosic crops and energywood. When developing climate mitigation strategies, it is crucial to assess forest biomass supply chains for the early detection of extinction risks in non-EU regions and for developing strategies to prevent increase of global impacts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biodiversity; biodiversity footprint; bioeconomy; closer-to-nature forests; land use; leakage effects; life cycle thinking; set-aside; species richness; wood trade
Research Programs: Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR)
Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR) > Integrated Biosphere Futures (IBF)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2023 09:31
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2024 13:52
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/18588

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item