Carbon Pricing is not Unjust

Mintz-Woo, K. ORCID: (2024). Carbon Pricing is not Unjust. Global Challenges e2300089. 10.1002/gch2.202300089.

[thumbnail of Global Challenges - 2023 - Mintz‐Woo - Carbon Pricing is not Unjust.pdf]
Global Challenges - 2023 - Mintz‐Woo - Carbon Pricing is not Unjust.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (359kB) | Preview


The aim of this perspective is to argue that carbon pricing is not unjust. Two important dimensions of justice are distributive and procedural (sometimes called “participatory”) justice. In terms of distributive justice, it is argued that carbon pricing can be made distributionally just through revenue recycling and that it should be expected that even neutral reductions in emissions will generate progressive benefits, both internationally and regionally. In terms of procedural justice, it is argued that carbon pricing is in principle compatible with any procedure; however, there is also a particular morally justifiable procedure, the Citizens’ Assembly, which has been implemented in Ireland on this precise question and has generated broad agreement on carbon pricing. It is suggested that this morally matters because such groups are like “ideal advisors” that offer morally important advice. Finally, an independent objection is offered to some ambitious alternatives to carbon pricing like Green New Deal-type frameworks, frameworks that aim to simultaneously tackle multiple social challenges. The objection is that these will take too long to work in a climate context, both to develop and to iterate.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon pricing, carbon taxes, climate ethics, climate justice, distributivejustice
Research Programs: Population and Just Societies (POPJUS)
Population and Just Societies (POPJUS) > Equity and Justice (EQU)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2023 09:48
Last Modified: 29 Jan 2024 16:41

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item