Solar irrigation potential in Sub-Saharan Africa: a crop-specific techno-economic analysis

Wamalwa, F., Maqelepo, L., Williams, N., & Falchetta, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-2195 (2024). Solar irrigation potential in Sub-Saharan Africa: a crop-specific techno-economic analysis. Environmental Research: Food Systems 1 (2) e025001. 10.1088/2976-601X/ad5e82.

Preview

Text Wamalwa_2024_Environ._Res.__Food_Syst._1_025001.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

In this study, we introduce an integrated modeling framework that combines a hydrologic model, a biophysical crop model, and a techno-economic model to assess solar irrigation potential in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) based on seven commonly grown food crops-maize, wheat, sorghum, potato, cassava, tomato, and onion. The study involves determining the irrigation requirements, location-specific capital investment costs, crop-specific profitability, and the cropland area under various cost scenarios (low and high) and soil fertility (low, moderate, near-optimal, and optimal) scenarios. Our research reveals considerable potential for solar irrigation, with profitability and viable cropland areas that vary according to crop type, irrigation system cost scenarios, and soil fertility levels. Our assessment shows that approximately 9.34 million ha of SSA's current rainfed cropland are hydrologically and economically feasible for solar irrigation. Specifically, maize and onion display the lowest and highest viability, spanning 1–4 million ha and 29–33 million ha, respectively, under optimal soil fertility conditions. In terms of profitability, maize and onion rank as the least and most economically viable crops for solar irrigation, yielding average annual returns of $50-$125/ha and $933-$1450/ha, respectively, under optimal soil fertility conditions. The lower and upper bounds of profitability and cropland range correspond to high-cost and low-cost scenarios, respectively. Furthermore, our study reveals distinct regional differences in the economic feasibility of solar irrigation. Eastern Africa is more economically favorable for maize, sorghum, tomato, and cassava. Central Africa stands out for onion cultivation, whereas West and Southern Africa are more profitable for potato and wheat, respectively. To realize the irrigation benefits highlighted, an energy input of 940-2,168 kWh/ha/yr is necessary, varying by crop and geographic sub-region of the SSA sub-continent. Our model and its results highlights the importance of selecting the right crops, applying fertilizers at the appropriate rates, and considering regional factors to maximize the benefits of solar irrigation in SSA. These insights are crucial for strategic planning and investment in the region's agricultural sector.

Actions (login required)

View Item