Impacts of land-use and land-cover changes on temperature-related mortality

Orlov, A., De Hertog, S.J., Havermann, F., Guo, S., Manola, I., Lejeune, Q., Schleussner, C.-F., Thiery, W., Pongratz, J., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Aunan, K., Armstrong, B., Royé, D., Cvijanovic, I., Lavigne, E., Achilleos, S., Bell, M., Masselot, P., Sera, F., et al. (2024). Impacts of land-use and land-cover changes on temperature-related mortality. Environmental Epidemiology 8 (6) e337. 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000337.

Preview

Text impacts_of_land_use_and_land_cover_changes_on.6.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background:
Land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) can substantially affect climate through biogeochemical and biogeophysical effects. Here, we examine the future temperature–mortality impact for two contrasting LULCC scenarios in a background climate of low greenhouse gas concentrations. The first LULCC scenario implies a globally sustainable land use and socioeconomic development (sustainability). In the second LULCC scenario, sustainability is implemented only in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries (inequality).

Methods:
Using the Multi-Country Multi-City (MCC) dataset on mortality from 823 locations in 52 countries and territories, we estimated the temperature–mortality exposure–response functions (ERFs). The LULCC and noLULCC scenarios were implemented in three fully coupled Earth system models (ESMs): Community Earth System Model, Max Planck Institute Earth System Model, and European Consortium Earth System Model. Next, using temperature from the ESMs’ simulations and the estimated location-specific ERFs, we assessed the temperature-related impact on mortality for the LULCC and noLULCC scenarios around the mid and end century.

Results:
Under sustainability, the multimodel mean changes in excess mortality range from −1.1 to +0.6 percentage points by 2050–2059 across all locations and from −1.4 to +0.5 percentage points by 2090–2099. Under inequality, these vary from −0.7 to +0.9 percentage points by 2050–2059 and from −1.3 to +2 percentage points by 2090–2099.

Conclusions:
While an unequal socioeconomic development and unsustainable land use could increase the burden of heat-related mortality in most regions, globally sustainable land use has the potential to reduce it in some locations. However, the total (cold and heat) impact on mortality is very location specific and strongly depends on the underlying climate change scenario due to nonlinearity in the temperature–mortality relationship.

Actions (login required)

View Item