Bridging Science and Practice on Multi-Hazard Risk Drivers: Stakeholder Insights from Five Pilot Studies in Europe

van Maanen, N., de Ruiter, M., Jäger, W., Casartelli, V., Ciurean, R., Padron, N., Daloz, A.S., Geurts, D., Gottardo, S., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-8171, López Diez, A., Díaz Pacheco, J., Dorta Antequera, P., Febles Arévalo, T., García González, S., Hernández-Martín, R., Alvarez-Albelo, C., Diaz-Hernandez, J.J., Ma, L., Monteleone, L., et al. (2025). Bridging Science and Practice on Multi-Hazard Risk Drivers: Stakeholder Insights from Five Pilot Studies in Europe. EGUsphere 10.5194/egusphere-2025-3075. (Submitted)

Preview

Text egusphere-2025-3075.pdf - Submitted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (729kB) | Preview

Abstract

Effective disaster risk management requires approaches that account for multiple interacting hazards, dynamic vulnerabilities, and institutional complexity. Yet many existing risk assessment methods struggle to reflect how these risks evolve in practice. This paper explores multi-hazard risk dynamics through stakeholder interviews across five European regions (Veneto, Scandinavia, the North Sea, the Danube Region, and the Canary Islands). Stakeholders described how exposure and vulnerability shift over time due to climate change, urban development, and socio-economic dependencies. The interviews highlight governance challenges and the critical role of institutional coordination, as well as synergies and asynergies in DRR measures, where efforts to reduce one risk can unintentionally increase another. By foregrounding real-world experiences across diverse hazard landscapes and sectors, this study offers empirical insights into how multi-hazard risk is perceived and managed. It underscores the need for flexible, context-sensitive strategies that bridge scientific assessment with decision-making on the ground.

Actions (login required)

View Item