Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal

Prütz, R., Rogelj, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-9061, Ganti, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-4076, Price, J., Warren, R., Forstenhäusler, N., Wu, Y., Augustynczik, A.L.D., Wögerer​, M., Krisztin, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-8628, Havlík, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-5085, Kraxner, F., Frank, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-8547, Hasegawa, T., Doelman, J.C., Daioglou, V., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., & Fuss, S. (2026). Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal. Nature Climate Change 10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5. (In Press)

Preview

Text s41558-026-02557-5.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (10MB) | Preview

Abstract

Pathways consistent with global climate objectives typically deploy billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from land-intensive methods such as forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Such large-scale deployment of land-intensive CDR may have negative consequences for biodiversity. Here we assess scenarios across five integrated assessment models and show that scenarios consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C allocate up to 13% of global areas of high biodiversity importance for land-intensive CDR. These overlaps are distributed unevenly, with higher shares in low- and middle-income countries. Understanding the potential conflicts between climate action and biodiversity conservation is crucial. An illustrative analysis shows that if current biodiversity hotspots were protected from land-use change, over half the land allocated for forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the assessed scenarios would be unavailable unless synergies between climate and conservation goals are leveraged. Our analysis also indicates CDR-related biodiversity benefits due to avoided warming.

Actions (login required)

View Item