Sufficientarianism, Thresholds, and Climate Loss and Damage

Mintz-Woo, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-9561 (2026). Sufficientarianism, Thresholds, and Climate Loss and Damage. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 18 (2) 10.23941/ejpe.v18i2.1017.

Preview

Text 18-2-si-Mintz-Woo.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (221kB) | Preview

Abstract

With respect to climate Loss and Damage, Laura García-Portela adopts both a sufficientarian account of distributional justice and a Polluter Pays Principle whereby historical emissions are the basis for transfers. This paper makes three main claims. First, it argues that the way that García-Portela adopts a Polluter Pays Principle means that her sufficientarianism would be largely otiose for polluters. Second, it argues that her account of harm leaves questions unanswered about how to classify and respond to climate impacts above her threshold. Finally, it argues that, insofar as the basis for transfers are harms defined as falling below a threshold, an alternative account, the “Polluter Pays, Then Receives Principle” has a better practical and theoretical fit.

Actions (login required)

View Item