Conceptualizing irreconcilable disagreements in the nature futures framework over intrinsic and instrumental values

Woodhouse, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8248-2143 (2026). Conceptualizing irreconcilable disagreements in the nature futures framework over intrinsic and instrumental values. Environmental Values 10.1177/09632719261437695. (In Press)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

1. The nature futures framework (NFF) is a tool, adopted by IPBES, used to design scenarios which explicitly trade-off three ways of valuing nature: instrumental, intrinsic, and relational. In its current format, the NFF is depicted as a triangle, with each value perspective occupying the extreme corner node, and a smooth continuum of potential perspectives along each edge.

2. In this paper I question whether a continuum/gradient is the proper way to understand the relationship between these value-perspectives. Looking specifically at the axis between the Intrinsic and Instrumental value nodes, this paper looks in depth at debates and insights from the environmental philosophy and ethics literature and gives three reasons for thinking that a continuum does not adequately capture how these irreconcilable values are thought to relate.

3. Additionally, I argue that graduated depiction in the NFF has been made plausible through a contestable translation of the discussion from “values” to “policy/scenario preferences” that relies heavily on a presumed immutable connection between value and preference. This can run the risk of scenario designers making problematic revealed preference assumptions.

4. Recognizing the incommensurability of these values has implications for how we employ the NFF. I consider two methods for revising the NFF in light of these critiques, including a three-step framework using the NFF for eliciting value-preference connections that can be used in scenario design.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Nature futures framework, convention of biological diversity, KMGBF, scenarios and modelsintrinsic values, environmental ethics, global biodiversity framework, IPBES
Research Programs:	Population and Just Societies (POPJUS) Population and Just Societies (POPJUS) > Equity and Justice (EQU)
Depositing User:	Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited:	07 Apr 2026 11:16
Last Modified:	07 Apr 2026 11:16
URI:	https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21438

Actions (login required)

View Item