Climate refugia implications of warming and land-intensive mitigation under overshoot

Prütz, R., Fuss, S., Price, J., Warren, R., Forstenhäusler, N., Wu, Y., Derci Augustynczik, A.L., Wögerer​, M., Krisztin, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-8628, Havlik, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-5085, Kraxner, F., Frank, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-8547, Hasegawa, T., Doelman, J.C., Daioglou, V., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., & Rogelj, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-9061 (2026). Climate refugia implications of warming and land-intensive mitigation under overshoot. Environmental Research Letters 21 (12) e124024. 10.1088/1748-9326/ae7b65.

[thumbnail of Prütz_2026_Environ._Res._Lett._21_124024.pdf]
Preview
Text
Prütz_2026_Environ._Res._Lett._21_124024.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Project: Paris Agreement Overshooting – Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE, H2020 101003687), Bridging current knowledge gaps to enable the UPTAKE of carbon dioxide removal methods (UPTAKE, HE 101081521)

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is expected to escalate with every increment of global warming. Simultaneously, land-intensive climate change mitigation strategies, such as afforestation and bioenergy, may further compound biodiversity loss. So far, the magnitude of these two drivers has not been compared in the context of temperature overshoot, meaning the temporary exceedance of a targeted global warming limit. By combining spatial data on climate refugia (areas sheltering biodiversity from climate change), bioenergy cropland, and forestation for multiple cost-effective scenarios with varying levels of climate action and overshoot, we illustrate how both warming and mitigation affect today’s climate refugia across five integrated assessment models. Decisive climate action, compatible with limiting warming to 1.5 °C, reduces the combined loss of today’s climate refugia due to warming and mitigation-related land-use change by more than 50% compared to current climate policies, outweighing potentially negative implications of mitigation at the global level by limiting the magnitude and duration of warming above 1.5 °C. We observe notable differences across regions and the considered model frameworks. Overshoot implications strongly depend on the underlying biodiversity recovery assumptions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biodiversity, bioenergy, scenarios, overshoot, peak-and-decline, recovery, forestation
Research Programs: Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR)
Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR) > Agriculture, Forestry, and Ecosystem Services (AFE)
Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR) > Integrated Biosphere Futures (IBF)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) > Integrated Assessment and Climate Change (IACC)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) > Transformative Institutional and Social Solutions (TISS)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2026 07:45
Last Modified: 29 Jun 2026 07:45
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21685

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item