Misinformation without liars: How invisible data-processing choices manufacture false conclusions in automated text analysis

Komendantova, N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-6179 & Pesov, P. (2026). Misinformation without liars: How invisible data-processing choices manufacture false conclusions in automated text analysis. Statistical Journal of the IAOS 10.1177/18747655261480969. (In Press)

[thumbnail of komendantova-pesov-2026-misinformation-without-liars-how-invisible-data-processing-choices-manufacture-false.pdf]
Preview
Text
komendantova-pesov-2026-misinformation-without-liars-how-invisible-data-processing-choices-manufacture-false.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (978kB) | Preview

Abstract

Official statistics increasingly draws on non-traditional sources, such as social-media posts and other web-scraped text, analysed with AI language models for nowcasting, indicator production, and crisis monitoring. We show that such pipelines can manufacture false statistics with no misinformation actor involved: ordinary, invisible data-processing choices are enough. Using standard, publicly available zero-shot classifiers, we give fully reproducible demonstrations on conflict-related messages. A routine “N comments” interface string captured by scrapers can collapse a model's judgement that a message concerns armed conflict from near-certain to below the retention threshold, while a benign sentence of equal length does not; the effect is large on a widely used model yet negligible on others. Four equally defensible phrasings of a single analytical question yield almost disjoint datasets from identical inputs, and swapping the classifier alone moves an unambiguous conflict report from retained to discarded. These distortions are silent and idiosyncratic: pipelines return confident, plausible numbers, and the direction and size of error depend on the specific model, prompt, and preprocessing. We argue that interpretation artifacts are a distinct threat to data quality and public trust, and propose a short, demonstrated audit that statistical agencies can adopt.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Official statistics, text-as-data, data quality, misinformation, reproducibility
Research Programs: Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA)
Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) > Cooperation and Transformative Governance (CAT)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 07 Sep 2026 07:29
Last Modified: 07 Sep 2026 07:29
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21852

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item