Biodiversity conservation policies alter the solution space of climate mitigation scenarios

Steinhauser, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-6855, Riahi, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-3498, Sengupta, S., Dietrich, J., Maczek, F., von Jeetze, P., Fricko, O. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-9883, Sheng, D., Humpenöder, F., Krey, V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-3515, Obersteiner, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-2769, & Popp, A. (2026). Biodiversity conservation policies alter the solution space of climate mitigation scenarios. EarthArXiv 10.31223/X5WF80. (Submitted)

[thumbnail of steinhauser_et_al-biodiversity_conservation_policies_alter_climate_mitigation_solution_space.pdf]
Preview
Text
steinhauser_et_al-biodiversity_conservation_policies_alter_climate_mitigation_solution_space.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Conserving biodiversity while mitigating climate change is one of the defining sustainability challenges of this century. Paris-aligned mitigation pathways rely heavily on forest restoration and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). While forest restoration can simultaneously enhance wildlife habitat and increase carbon sequestration, large-scale biomass production for BECCS may intensify land competition and conflict with biodiversity conservation goals. Here, we use an interlinked land-use (MAgPIE), energy (MESSAGEix), and climate (MAGICC) modeling framework to explore the synergies and trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation. We find that sustainable bioenergy potential compatible with ambitious biodiversity conservation targets is below 100 EJ/yr, limiting late-century carbon removal through BECCS in 2 °C scenarios to less than 6 GtCO₂/yr. At the same time, ambitious biodiversity conservation can approximately double carbon sequestration in forest systems. Our results show that Paris temperature goals remain achievable under ambitious biodiversity targets and that peak temperatures are lowered as much as 0.2°C compared to Paris-aligned scenarios without biodiversity targets, although doing so requires earlier and more stringent decarbonization.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: climate, bioenergy, biodiversity, CDR, negative emissions
Research Programs: Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA)
Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) > Exploratory Modeling of Human-natural Systems (EM)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) > Integrated Assessment and Climate Change (IACC)
Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) > Sustainable Service Systems (S3)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 08 Sep 2026 12:05
Last Modified: 08 Sep 2026 12:28
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21857

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item