Towards a Deliberative Framework for Systemic Risk Communication

Hofbauer, B., Guimaraes, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-9238, Schweizer, P.-J., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-8171, & Dryhurst, S. (2026). Towards a Deliberative Framework for Systemic Risk Communication. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1668 (1) e012007. 10.1088/1755-1315/1668/1/012007.

[thumbnail of Hofbauer_2026_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._1668_012007.pdf]
Preview
Text
Hofbauer_2026_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._1668_012007.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (489kB) | Preview
Project: DIsaster Resilience for Extreme ClimaTe Events providing interoperable Data, models, communication and governance (DIRECTED, HE 101073978)

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for the communication of systemic risk. The framework is termed ‘deliberative’ to highlight two qualities the article argues are necessary for robust systemic risk communication: its participatory nature, which draws in diverse actors across disciplines and communities, and its reciprocal nature, which ensures that communication is ongoing rather than one-directional. Systemic risks pose an existential threat to the functioning of vital societal systems, e.g. through climate disruption and environmental degradation, financial instability, grave inequality, and democratic backsliding. Tackling these risks requires effective communication that takes various challenges into account. These range from dynamic changes of circumstance, complexity and uncertainty, spatio-temporal dispersion, to public (dis)trust These challenges arise precisely because systemic risks, by definition, cut across multiple systems and sectors, drawing in actors from different disciplines, institutions, and communities who do not share a common framework for understanding or responding to them. Specifically, systemic risk communication needs to operate across multiple actors and different communities, due to the boundary-crossing nature of systemic risks. Accordingly, the communication framework presented here is explicitly deliberative, building on meaningful participation between researchers, the people affected, and decision-makers, while also ensuring robust and reflective information-sharing.

Item Type: Article
Research Programs: Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA)
Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) > Systemic Risk and Resilience (SYRR)
Population and Just Societies (POPJUS)
Population and Just Societies (POPJUS) > Equity and Justice (EQU)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2026 12:43
Last Modified: 21 Sep 2026 13:39
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21883

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item