Do governments have the right mix in their energy R&D portfolios?

Grubler, A. ORCID: & Riahi, K. ORCID: (2010). Do governments have the right mix in their energy R&D portfolios? Carbon Management 1 (1) 79-87. 10.4155/cmt.10.16.

Full text not available from this repository.


Climate change is a major externality justifying government-sponsored R&D efforts into climate-friendy technologies. Current and near-term R&D is needed to develop new and improve existing technological options that will be needed in the long-term future to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The paper contrasts historical and current government R&D spending of the member countries of the International Energy Agency with a need-based analysis of technologies required to achieve long-term climate stabilization. The assessment of technology needs draws on the popular 'stabilization wedge' concept and is based on an analysis of a wide range of (22) scenarios of future technology deployment rates under a range of climate constraints that reflect important long-term uncertainties. We identify a significant mismatch to current energy technology R&D portfolios. The largest gap is between energy efficiency that is under-represented in current R&D portfolios and nuclear, which is over-represented, when compared with their respective importance for future climate mitigation efforts. Our discussion, therefore, focuses largely on these two contrasting mitigation options: energy efficiency versus nuclear.

Item Type: Article
Research Programs: Energy (ENE)
Transitions to New Technologies (TNT)
Bibliographic Reference: Carbon Management; 1(1):79-87 (October 2010)
Related URLs:
Depositing User: IIASA Import
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2016 08:43
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2021 17:21

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item