Analysing energy innovation portfolios from a systemic perspective

16043 11 88219 3 251857 document 88219 Kim&Wilson_EnergyPolicy2019_Post-Print.pdf application/pdf 92c7ef2d17b1e1efcbea0dedf136d8ab MD5 1438194 2019-08-27 08:02:44 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16043/1/Kim%26Wilson_EnergyPolicy2019_Post-Print.pdf 16043 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_nc_nd_4

Kim&Wilson_EnergyPolicy2019_Post-Print.pdf

accepted 88220 2 251861 document 88220 lightbox.jpg image/png f717e459e5b9431dfa58ab2846be0015 MD5 19901 2019-08-27 08:12:53 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16043/2/lightbox.jpg 16043 2 2 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_lightbox en staffonly

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/88219 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/88219 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/88219 archive 353 disk0/00/01/60/43 2019-08-26 06:02:08 2021-08-27 17:32:03 2019-08-26 06:02:08 article show Kim Y.J. Wilson C. 8428 0000-0001-8164-3566 Analysing energy innovation portfolios from a systemic perspective pub prog_tnt Energy innovation system; Indicator; Portfolio; EU SET plan A systemic perspective on energy innovation is required to design effective portfolios of directed innovation activity. We contribute a standardised set of technology-specific indicators which describe processes throughout the energy technology innovation system, ranging from patents and publications to policy mixes, collaborative activity, and market share. Using these indicators, we then conceptualise and develop benchmark tests for three portfolio design criteria: balance, consistency, and alignment. Portfolio balance refers to the relative emphasis on specific technologies. Portfolio consistency refers to the relative emphasis on related innovation system processes. Portfolio alignment refers to the relative emphasis on innovation system processes for delivering targeted outcomes. We demonstrate the application of these benchmark tests using data for the EU's Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan which spans six technology fields. We find the SET Plan portfolio generally performs well particularly in areas over which portfolio managers have direct influence such as RD&D funding. However we also identify potential areas of imbalance, inconsistency, and misalignment which warrant further attention and potential redress by portfolio managers. Overall, we show how energy innovation portfolios can be analysed from a systemic perspective using a replicable, standardised set of measures of diverse innovation system processes. 2019-11 published Elsevier 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110942 333 public Energy Policy 134 e110942 TRUE 0301-4215 Metrics, Models and Foresight for Navigating the Roadmap for Clean, Secure and Efficient Energy Innovation (SET-Nav, H2020 691843) Social Influence and Disruptive Low Carbon Innovations (SILCI, H2020 678799) FALSE yes info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691843/EU//SET-Nav; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/678799/EU//SILCI info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess