A value-driven approach to addressing misinformation in social media

17013 15 93105 2 269820 document 93105 41599_2020_702_OnlinePDF.pdf application/pdf 63a378f399669c3249141de8606be853 MD5 933785 2021-01-29 08:31:42 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17013/1/41599_2020_702_OnlinePDF.pdf 17013 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_4

41599_2020_702_OnlinePDF.pdf

published 93106 1 269827 document 93106 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 4f53bec778d26746d554ea26125a13e3 MD5 16390 2021-01-29 08:41:48 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17013/2/indexcodes.txt 17013 2 2 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/93105 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/93105 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/93105 archive 353 disk0/00/01/70/13 2021-01-29 08:36:03 2024-04-29 12:39:18 2021-01-29 08:36:03 article show Komendantova N. 1880 0000-0003-2568-6179 Ekenberg L 7576 0000-0002-0665-1889 Svahn M. Larsson A. Shah S.I.H. Glinos M. Koulolias V. Danielson M. 9381 A value-driven approach to addressing misinformation in social media pub ASA CAT Misinformation in social media is an actual and contested policy problem given its outreach and the variety of stakeholders involved. In particular, increased social media use makes the spread of misinformation almost universal. Here we demonstrate a framework for evaluating tools for detecting misinformation using a preference elicitation approach, as well as an integrated decision analytic process for evaluating desirable features of systems for combatting misinformation. The framework was tested in three countries (Austria, Greece, and Sweden) with three groups of stakeholders (policymakers, journalists, and citizens). Multi-criteria decision analysis was the methodological basis for the research. The results showed that participants prioritised information regarding the actors behind the distribution of misinformation and tracing the life cycle of misinformative posts. Another important criterion was whether some one intended to delude others, which shows a preference for trust, accountability, and quality in, for instance, journalism. Also, how misinformation travels is important. However, all criteria that involved active contributions to dealing with misinformation were ranked low in importance, which shows that participants may not have felt personally involved enough in the subject or situation. The results also show differences in preferences for tools that are influenced by cultural background and that might be considered in the further development of tools. 2021-01-29 published NPG 10.1057/s41599-020-00702-9 161 79 3245 public Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 e33 TRUE 2662-9992 Co-Creating Misinformation-Resilient Societies (Co-Inform, H2020 770302) FALSE yes info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/770302/EU//Co-inform info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess