A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures

17204 9 94094 2 273821 document 94094 fpubh-09-583706.pdf application/pdf 3702775f9ea64eccb1564202ba403b91 MD5 1323016 2021-05-11 11:44:54 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17204/1/fpubh-09-583706.pdf 17204 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_4

fpubh-09-583706.pdf

published 94100 2 273832 document 94100 lightbox.jpg image/png 1f778e8ad0f814dcc4d230d1a50ade60 MD5 54238 2021-05-11 11:54:57 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17204/2/lightbox.jpg 17204 2 2 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94094 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94094 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94094 archive 353 disk0/00/01/72/04 2021-05-11 11:46:22 2024-09-09 12:56:47 2021-05-11 11:46:22 article show Ekenberg L. 7576 0000-0002-0665-1889 Mihai A. Fasth T. Komendantova N. 1880 0000-0003-2568-6179 Danielson M. 9381 A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures pub ASA CAT multi-criteria decision analysis, managing and mitigating the risk of COVID 19 pandemic, risk governance, SEIR models, participation and inclusion In managing the COVID-19 pandemic, several compelling narratives seem to have played a significant role in the decision-making processes regarding which risk mitigation and management measures to implement. Many countries were to a large extent unprepared for such a situation, even though predictions about a significant probability for a pandemic to occur existed, and national governments of several countries often acted in an uncoordinated manner, which resulted in many inconsistencies in the disaster risk reduction processes. Limited evidence has also made room for strategic narratives meant to persuade the public of the chosen set of actions, even though the degree of uncertainty regarding the outcomes of these was high, further complicating the situation. In this article, we assume a normative standpoint regarding rhapsodic decision making and suggest an integrated framework for a more elaborated decision analysis under the ambiguity of how to contain the virus spread from a policy point of view, while considering epidemiologic estimations and socioeconomic factors in a multi-stakeholder-multi-criteria context based on a co-creative work process for eliciting attitudes, perceptions, as well as preferences amongst relevant stakeholder groups. The framework, applied in our paper on Romania for demonstrative purposes, is used for evaluating mitigation measures for catastrophic events such as the COVID-19 situation, to mobilize better response strategies for future scenarios related to pandemics and other hazardous events, as well as to structure the production and analysis of narratives on the current pandemic effects. 2021-04 published Frontiers 10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706 79 161 3245 public Frontiers in Public Health 9 e583706 TRUE 2296-2565 FALSE no info:eu-repo/semantics/article