Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models

17213 7 94136 2 273918 document 94136 Keppo_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_053006.pdf application/pdf 024387931a83bba957723c44e9746244 MD5 718159 2021-05-14 07:04:36 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17213/1/Keppo_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_053006.pdf 17213 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_4

Keppo_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_053006.pdf

published 94142 1 273929 document 94142 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 0ad4e3f1f3d1acf670f79cff84f3d529 MD5 24607 2021-05-14 07:14:44 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17213/2/indexcodes.txt 17213 2 2 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94136 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94136 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/94136 archive 353 disk0/00/01/72/13 2021-05-14 07:09:37 2021-08-27 17:34:44 2021-05-14 07:09:37 article show Keppo I. Butnar I. Bauer N. Caspani M. Edelenbosch O. Emmerling J. Fragkos P. Guivarch C. Harmsen M. Lefèvre J. Le Gallic T. Leimbach M. McDowall W. Mercure J-F Schaeffer R. Trutnevyte E. Wagner F. 1789 0000-0003-3429-2374 Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models pub ECE ECEPM TISS Integrated assessment models (IAMs) have emerged as key tools for building and assessing long term climate mitigation scenarios. Due to their central role in the recent IPCC assessments, and international climate policy analyses more generally, and the high uncertainties related to future projections, IAMs have been critically assessed by scholars from different fields receiving various critiques ranging from adequacy of their methods to how their results are used and communicated. Although IAMs are conceptually diverse and evolved in very different directions, they tend to be criticised under the umbrella of 'IAMs'. Here we first briefly summarise the IAM landscape and how models differ from each other. We then proceed to discuss six prominent critiques emerging from the recent literature, reflect and respond to them in the light of IAM diversity and ongoing work and suggest ways forward. The six critiques relate to (a) representation of heterogeneous actors in the models, (b) modelling of technology diffusion and dynamics, (c) representation of capital markets, (d) energy-economy feedbacks, (e) policy scenarios, and (f) interpretation and use of model results. 2021-04-29 published Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP) 10.1088/1748-9326/abe5d8 321 public Environmental Research Letters 16 5 e053006 TRUE 1748-9326 Next generation of AdVanced InteGrated Assessment modelling to support climaTE policy making (NAVIGATE, H2020 821124) FALSE yes Next generation of AdVanced InteGrated Assessment modelling to support climaTE policy making (NAVIGATE, H2020 821124) info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess