Integrated spatial planning for biodiversity conservation and food production

17641 11 96122 3 296459 document 96122 IntegratedSpatialPlanning_OneEarth.pdf application/pdf 18388327a626cb4e04da016bf85d6280 MD5 434417 2021-11-15 09:08:01 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17641/1/IntegratedSpatialPlanning_OneEarth.pdf 17641 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_nc_nd_4

IntegratedSpatialPlanning_OneEarth.pdf

2023-11-10 accepted 96123 2 296462 document 96123 lightbox.jpg image/png ecc3757a7dcc0958b038b75ef9d47fa0 MD5 48713 2021-11-15 09:08:29 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17641/2/lightbox.jpg 17641 2 2 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_lightbox en staffonly

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/96122 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/96122 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/96122 archive 353 disk0/00/01/76/41 2021-11-15 07:04:45 2025-08-13 05:00:22 2021-11-15 07:04:45 article show Fastré C. van Zeist W.-J. Watson J.E.M. Visconti P. 2230 0000-0001-6823-2826 Integrated spatial planning for biodiversity conservation and food production pub BNR BEC species conservation; conservation planning; food security; Global Biodiversity Framework; spatial planning; agriculture; Convention on Biological Diversity Ambitious area-based conservation targets are at the forefront of the post-2020 biodiversity conservation agenda. However, implementing such targets cannot be done without accounting for the increasing demand for farmland products, the main driver of biodiversity loss worldwide. Here, we analyze the expected conservation gains and farming opportunity costs of three alternative global conservation strategies under business-as-usual demand in farmland products by 2030. We find that integrated spatial planning can reach the same species conservation objectives at 25%–40% of the opportunity cost for food production, or 400%–600% the biodiversity benefit for similar opportunity costs as opposed to planning for each objective separately. This requires managing over 60% of land in ways that are compatible with biodiversity conservation, which includes restoring 8%–11% of land surface. Achieving global conservation targets can be compatible with protecting biodiversity and ensuring food security but only with efforts to negotiate land governance strategies across multiple stakeholders and their objectives. 2021-11-11 published Cell Press 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.014 3114 public One Earth 4 11 1635-1644 TRUE 2590-3322 no info:eu-repo/semantics/article