A Descriptive Model of Choice for Siting Facilities

1871 13 59435 2 165861 document 59435 RR-82-39.pdf application/pdf 6015cab57653e12f097fbc6fd1814f93 MD5 8398640 2016-06-02 08:28:10 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/1871/1/RR-82-39.pdf 1871 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by

RR-82-39.pdf

published 59436 2 165864 document 59436 lightbox.jpg image/png e4ca5cb0dacc6d9856602d1f61a729ec MD5 10142 2016-06-02 08:28:22 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/1871/2/lightbox.jpg 1871 2 2 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/59435 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/59435 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/59435 archive 351 disk0/00/00/18/71 2016-01-15 01:50:53 2021-08-27 17:10:41 2016-01-15 01:50:53 monograph show 3 Kunreuther H.C. AL1609 Lathrop J.W. AL0222 Linnerooth J. 1354 A Descriptive Model of Choice for Siting Facilities pub iis_rsk iis_mod iis_ene prog_mmt The siting of facilities for large-scale, novel technologies presents a formidable challenge to political risk management. This paper develops a model for describing the decision process for this type of problem at the level of societal systems. It explicitly considers the role of the relevant interested parties, each of whom brings to the siting debate its own set of objectives and attributes. We have labeled the approach a multiattribute multiparity model (MAMP to distinguish it from prescriptive techniques such as multiattribute utility analysis or decision analysis). The MAMP model is a natural extension of the burgeoning literature on the key role that limited time, attention, and information processing capabilities play in political decision making when there are uncertain outcomes and likely conflicts among interested parties. The model also highlights the importance of decentralized and sequential decision making and indicates the role that formal risk assessments have played at each stage of the process. We illustrate the application in the context of the decision process associated with a proposed liquefied natural gas terminal in California. The concluding portion of this paper suggests future research needs for improving the credibility of analysis and facilitating collective action with respect to facility siting problems. 1982 published RR-82-039. Reprinted from Behavioral Science, 27(3) [1982]. RP-82-039 Reprinted from Behavioral Science; 27(3) [1982] 10 2572 2100 182 public research_reprint Behavioral Science 27 3 IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria 20 TRUE FALSE info:eu-repo/semantics/book