An assessment of the state of conservation planning in Europe

19600 13 105509 2 320829 document 105509 jung-et-al-2024-an-assessment-of-the-state-of-conservation-planning-in-europe.pdf application/pdf 3cf6fdb91b38f89828a9205daf5ba2fb MD5 668002 2024-04-09 09:47:08 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/19600/1/jung-et-al-2024-an-assessment-of-the-state-of-conservation-planning-in-europe.pdf 19600 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_4

jung-et-al-2024-an-assessment-of-the-state-of-conservation-planning-in-europe.pdf

published 105510 1 320833 document 105510 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 5fe1cfd047d47033d17bcb8300a62b15 MD5 18332 2024-04-09 09:47:35 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/19600/2/indexcodes.txt 19600 2 2 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/105509 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/105509 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/105509 archive 2 disk0/00/01/96/00 2024-04-09 09:47:20 2025-08-13 05:00:24 2024-04-09 09:47:20 article show Jung M. 2245 0000-0002-7569-1390 Alagador D. Chapman M. 9757 0000-0002-1377-1539 Hermoso V. Kujala H. O'Connor L. 2383 Schinegger R. Verburg P.H. Visconti P. 2230 0000-0001-6823-2826 An assessment of the state of conservation planning in Europe pub BNR BEC prog_ysp biodiversity conservation, spatial optimization,prioritization,‘30 × 30’, decision theory, stakeholder Expanding and managing current habitat and species protection measures is at the heart of the European biodiversity strategy. A structured approach is needed to gain insights into such issues is systematic conservation planning, which uses techniques from decision theory to identify places and actions that contribute most effectively to policy objectives given a set of constraints. Yet culturally and historically determined European landscapes make the implementation of any conservation plans challenging, requiring an analysis of synergies and trade-offs before implementation. In this work, we review the scientific literature for evidence of previous conservation planning approaches, highlighting recent advances and success stories. We find that the conceptual characteristics of European conservation planning studies likely reduced their potential in contributing to better-informed decisions. We outline pathways towards improving the uptake of decision theory and multi-criteria conservation planning at various scales, particularly highlighting the need for (a) open data and intuitive tools, (b) the integration of biodiversity-focused conservation planning with multiple objectives, (c) accounting of dynamic ecological processes and functions, and (d) better facilitation of entry-points and co-design practices of conservation planning scenarios with stakeholders. By adopting and improving these practices, European conservation planning might become more actionable and adaptable towards implementable policy outcomes. 2024 doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0015 3143 3460 3554 3114 public Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 379 1902 e20230015 TRUE 0962-8436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8104715 data https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/19317 data NaturaConnect - Designing a resilient and coherent Trans-European Network for Nature and People (NaturaConnect, HE 101060429) yes info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101060429/EU//NaturaConnect info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess