21497 6 113632 2 342897 document 113632 ehs.0509.pdf application/pdf 84c311247ffe58424ceaa9b126c2be04 MD5 6790489 2026-04-22 14:24:52 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/1/ehs.0509.pdf 21497 1 1 application/pdf text en public cc_by_4

ehs.0509.pdf

published 113633 2 342903 document 113633 lightbox.jpg image/png bd9596b7ef2a376e96d715b645afd2c6 MD5 57289 2026-04-22 14:34:58 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/2/lightbox.jpg 21497 2 2 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/islightboxThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 113634 2 342904 document 113634 preview.jpg image/png 3dbdc5bf1ae622ec89bb095c8b7af121 MD5 22618 2026-04-22 14:34:58 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/3/preview.jpg 21497 3 3 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_preview en public

preview.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 113635 2 342905 document 113635 medium.jpg image/png 5ecce072f2e19c118fc00ef637abe60e MD5 7373 2026-04-22 14:34:59 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/4/medium.jpg 21497 4 4 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_medium en public

medium.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/ismediumThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 113636 2 342906 document 113636 small.jpg image/png ba0d793bcd37bc954078898742e267de MD5 1907 2026-04-22 14:34:59 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/5/small.jpg 21497 5 5 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from text to thumbnail_small en public

small.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 113637 1 342907 document 113637 indexcodes.txt text/plain e3d112fdefcbbd538f120e6ce035a571 MD5 15471 2026-04-22 14:35:01 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/21497/6/indexcodes.txt 21497 6 6 text/plain other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/document/113632 archive 353 disk0/00/02/14/97 2026-04-22 14:27:07 2026-04-22 14:27:07 2026-04-22 14:27:07 article show Gu J. Geng W. Li Z. Fath B. 7597 0000-0001-9440-6842 Pan F. Shi H. Chen J. Kong Y. Tao S. Song G. pub ASA SYRR Evaluating vegetation resistance and resilience is key to understanding ecosystem responses to human disturbances such as road construction and to guiding ecological restoration. This study systematically assessed the resistance and resilience of vegetation and microclimate along the Hangrui Expressway in southwestern China using remote sensing techniques. Landsat imagery from 10 representative years between the preconstruction period (1993) and the recovery period (2021) was analyzed, with indicators such as the normalized difference vegetation index, surface temperature, and evapotranspiration used to characterize vegetation and microclimate. The study area was divided into 200-m buffer zones, and resistance–resilience indicators were developed to reveal spatial distribution patterns. In addition, an optimized “forest–grassland ratio” was proposed to guide vegetation configuration strategies, effectively promoting the enhancement of both vegetation and microclimate resilience. Structural equation modeling identified the key factors influencing roadside vegetation resistance and resilience. The results showed that most areas exhibited strong resistance and resilience, enabling rapid recovery after disturbances. Vegetation typically required about 4 years to recover, while surface temperature and evapotranspiration required 7 and 2 years, respectively, to return to predisturbance levels. Topographic factors were significantly positively correlated with microclimate resilience, while climate factors were positively correlated with microclimate resilience but negatively correlated with vegetation resilience. Climate and topography were the main influencing factors. The optimal forest–grassland ratio varied across different regions. These findings underscore the importance of considering local climatic and topographic conditions in road planning and ecological restoration to improve restoration outcomes and promote ecosystem stability. 2026-01-01 published Wiley-Blackwell doi:10.34133/ehs.0509 84 public Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 12 e0509 TRUE 2332-8878 info:eu-repo/semantics/article