Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties

Rogelj, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-9061, Fricko, O. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-9883, Meinshausen, M., Krey, V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-3515, Zilliacus, J.J.J., & Riahi, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-3498 (2017). Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. Nature Communications 8 e15748. 10.1038/ncomms15748.

[thumbnail of ncomms15748.pdf]
Preview
Text
ncomms15748.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (798kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of ncomms15748-s1.pdf]
Preview
Text
ncomms15748-s1.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (727kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of ncomms15748-s2.xlsx] Text
ncomms15748-s2.xlsx - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (100kB)
Project: Linking Climate and Development Policies - Leveraging International Networks and Knowledge Sharing (CD-LINKS, H2020 642147)

Abstract

The UN Paris Agreement puts in place a legally binding mechanism to increase mitigation action over time. Countries put forward pledges called nationally determined contributions (NDC) whose impact is assessed in global stocktaking exercises. Subsequently, actions can then be strengthened in light of the Paris climate objective: limiting global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C and pursuing efforts to limit it further to 1.5 °C. However, pledged actions are currently described ambiguously and this complicates the global stocktaking exercise. Here, we systematically explore possible interpretations of NDC assumptions, and show that this results in estimated emissions for 2030 ranging from 47 to 63 GtCO2e yr−1. We show that this uncertainty has critical implications for the feasibility and cost to limit warming well below 2 °C and further to 1.5 °C. Countries are currently working towards clarifying the modalities of future NDCs. We identify salient avenues to reduce the overall uncertainty by about 10 percentage points through simple, technical clarifications regarding energy accounting rules. Remaining uncertainties depend to a large extent on politically valid choices about how NDCs are expressed, and therefore raise the importance of a thorough and robust process that keeps track of where emissions are heading over time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Climate-change mitigation, Climate-change policy, Socioeconomic scenarios
Research Programs: Energy (ENE)
Depositing User: Michaela Rossini
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2017 15:12
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2021 17:29
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/14631

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item