Participatory environmental governance of infrastructure projects affecting reindeer husbandry in the Arctic

Landauer M & Komendantova N (2018). Participatory environmental governance of infrastructure projects affecting reindeer husbandry in the Arctic. Journal of Environmental Management 223: 385-395.

[img] Text
Landauer_Komendantova_2018 in press Journal of Environmental Management-preprint.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 June 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Several infrastructure projects are under development or already operational across the Arctic region. Often the deployment of such projects creates benefits at the national, regional, or global scales. However, local communities can experience negative impacts due to the requirements for extensive land areas, which cause pressure on traditional land use. Public participation in environmental planning such as Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) enables local communities to provide feedback on the environmental, social, and economic challenges of infrastructure projects. Ideally, participation can improve the means of social learning for all involved parties and help to co-develop sustainable solutions. The subject of our research is reindeer herders’ participation in EIA procedures of mines and wind farms in Finland because these types of projects affect reindeer husbandry. We study empirically how stakeholders involved in the EIAs perceive the participation of reindeer herders in the planning and implementation of infrastructure projects, and how these differ from the perceptions of the reindeer herders who are affected by the infrastructure projects. Our qualitative data is based on in-depth semi-structured interviews (N=31) with members of the industry sector, consultants, governmental authorities, and representatives of local communities; in this study, the reindeer herders. The results show that herders’ level of participation in the EIAs and the benefits and challenges of participation are perceived differently. Furthermore, the regulatory framework does not adequately ensure that the developer carries social and environmental responsibilities throughout the infrastructure project’s lifecycle, and that regular communication with herders will also be maintained after the EIAs. Herders’ expertise should be used throughout the project life cycle. For example, more attention should be paid to both negotiating possible options for compensation and monitoring mechanisms when the infrastructure projects are pre-screened for the EIAs, as well as to co-designing the different project alternatives with herders for the EIAs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: traditional livelihoods; Environmental Impact Assessment; land-use; mining; wind farms; Finland
Research Programs: Risk & Resilience (RISK)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2018 06:12
Last Modified: 26 Jun 2018 06:21
URI: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/15330

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313