A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps

Fritz, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-8549, See, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-7065, Bayas, J.C.B., Waldner, F., Jacques, D., Becker-Reshef, I., Whitcraft, A., Baruth, B., Bonifacio, R., Crutchfield, J., Rembold, F., Rojas, O., Schucknecht, A., Van der Velde, M., Verdin, J., Wu, B., Yan, N., You, L., Gilliams, S., Mücher, S., et al. (2019). A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps. Agricultural Systems 168 258-272. 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.010.

[thumbnail of 10.1016@j.agsy.2018.05.010.pdf]
Preview
Text
10.1016@j.agsy.2018.05.010.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Global agricultural monitoring, Earth observation; Gaps Spatial resolution; In-situ data; Crop calendars; Yield;; Crop production; Crop area
Research Programs: Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2018 07:28
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2022 05:00
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/15395

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item