The feasibility of climate action: Bridging the inside and the outside view through feasibility spaces

Jewell, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2846-9081 & Cherp, A. (2023). The feasibility of climate action: Bridging the inside and the outside view through feasibility spaces. WIREs Climate Change 14 (5) e838. 10.1002/wcc.838.

[thumbnail of WIREs Climate Change - 2023 - Jewell - The feasibility of climate action  Bridging the inside and the outside view through.pdf]
Preview
Text
WIREs Climate Change - 2023 - Jewell - The feasibility of climate action Bridging the inside and the outside view through.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (4MB) | Preview
Project: Exploring National and Global Actions to reduce Greenhouse gas Emissions (ENGAGE, H2020 821471), MechANIsms and actors of Feasible Energy Transitions (MANIFEST, H2020 950408)

Abstract

The feasibility of different options to reduce the risks of climate change has engaged scholars for decades. Yet there is no agreement on how to define and assess feasibility. We define feasible as “do-able under realistic assumptions.” A sound feasibility assessment is based on causal reasoning; enables comparison of feasibility across climate options, contexts, and implementation levels; and reflexively considers the agency of its audience. Global climate scenarios are a good starting point for assessing the feasibility of climate options since they represent causal pathways, quantify implementation levels, and consider policy choices. Yet, scenario developers face difficulties to represent all relevant causalities, assess the realism of assumptions, assign likelihood to potential outcomes, and evaluate the agency of their users, which calls for external feasibility assessments. Existing approaches to feasibility assessment mirror the “inside” and the “outside” view coined by Kahneman and co-authors. The inside view considers climate change as a unique challenge and seeks to identify barriers that should be overcome by political choice, commitment, and skill. The outside view assesses feasibility through examining historical analogies (reference cases) to the given climate option. Recent studies seek to bridge the inside and the outside views through “feasibility spaces,” by identifying reference cases for a climate option, measuring their outcomes and relevant characteristics, and mapping them together with the expected outcomes and characteristics of the climate option. Feasibility spaces are a promising method to prioritize climate options, realistically assess the achievability of climate goals, and construct scenarios with empirically-grounded assumptions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: climate change mitigation, climate scenarios, feasibility
Research Programs: Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA)
Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) > Cooperation and Transformative Governance (CAT)
Depositing User: Michaela Rossini
Date Deposited: 02 May 2023 12:49
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2024 13:45
URI: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/18760

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item