Rights-Based AI in Cyber–Physical Systems: A Governance Framework for Socio-Technical Resilience and Trust

Niazi, M., Hassani, H., & Lee, M. (2026). Rights-Based AI in Cyber–Physical Systems: A Governance Framework for Socio-Technical Resilience and Trust. Automation 7 (3) e96. 10.3390/automation7030096.

Preview

Text automation-07-00096-v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

AI-enabled cyber–physical systems (CPSs) are increasingly deployed in public governance contexts where they sense human populations, infer classifications or risks, and trigger interventions that can shape liberty, equality, and access to essential services. In these deployments, governance failures often arise not only from model error but from systems-level interactions across data generation, model updates, organizational practices, and downstream actuation. This paper introduces a Risk–Rights–Rules (3R) architecture that treats fundamental rights and legal rules as enforceable constraints on the sensing–inference–actuation loop, rather than as external ethical aspirations. Building on established risk-management baselines and safety engineering practice, we specify a testable assurance object, a structured 3R assurance case, that links rights claims to explicit assumptions, measurable evidence, and accountable control points across the lifecycle. The approach is designed to reduce “legitimacy drift” in stochastic decision pipelines by making uncertainty, demographic error, contestability, and procurement leverage auditable at the system level. The result is a governance blueprint for high-consequence public-sector AI deployments for governance failures, which is both technically robust and institutionally defensible.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	cyber–physical systems; socio-technical systems; public-sector AI governance; predictive AI; biometric identification; risk assessment; fundamental rights; assurance cases; Goal-Structuring Notation (GSN); STPA/STAMP; automation bias; procedural due process
Research Programs:	Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA) > Cooperation and Transformative Governance (CAT)
Depositing User:	Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited:	07 Jul 2026 08:59
Last Modified:	07 Jul 2026 08:59
URI:	https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/21710

Actions (login required)

View Item