Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles

Hooftman, D.A.P., Bullock, J.M., Jones, L., Eigenbrod, F., Barredo, J.I., Forrest, M., Kindermann, G. ORCID:, Thomas, A., et al. (2022). Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles. Ecosystem Services 53 e101398. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101398.

[thumbnail of ECOSER-D-21-00429_R2.pdf]
ECOSER-D-21-00429_R2.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (7MB) | Preview


Over the last decade many ecosystem service (ES) models have been developed to inform sustainable land and water use planning. However, uncertainty in the predictions of any single model in any specific situation can undermine their utility for decision-making. One solution is creating ensemble predictions, which potentially increase accuracy, but how best to create ES ensembles to reduce uncertainty is unknown and untested. Using ten models for carbon storage and nine for water supply, we tested a series of ensemble approaches against measured validation data in the UK. Ensembles had at minimum a 5–17% higher accuracy than a randomly selected individual model and, in general, ensembles weighted for among model consensus provided better predictions than unweighted ensembles. To support robust decision-making for sustainable development and reducing uncertainty around these decisions, our analysis suggests various ensemble methods should be applied depending on data quality, for example if validation data are available.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Carbon; Committee averaging; Prediction Error; Accuracy; United Kingdom; Validation; Water supply; Weighted averaging
Research Programs: Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR)
Biodiversity and Natural Resources (BNR) > Agriculture, Forestry, and Ecosystem Services (AFE)
Depositing User: Luke Kirwan
Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2022 13:40
Last Modified: 01 Feb 2024 03:00

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item