Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policy-making remains limited

Robledo-Abad C, Althaus HJ, Berndes G, Bolwig S, Corbera E, Creutzig F, Garcia-Ulloa J, Geddes A, et al. (2017). Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policy-making remains limited. GCB Bioenergy 9 (3): 541-556. DOI:10.1111/gcbb.12338.

[img]
Preview
Text
Bioenergy production and sustainable development.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
gcbb12338(1).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Project: Visions Of LANd use Transitions in Europe (VOLANTE, FP7 265104), Land use change: assessing the net climate forcing, and options for climate change mitigation and adaptation (LUC4C, FP7 603542)

Abstract

The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policy-making. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well-studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicate agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general understanding of the attribution of impacts. Nevertheless we identified regional patterns of positive or negative impacts for all categories - environmental, economic, institutional, social and technological. In general, economic and technological impacts were more frequently reported as positive, while social and environmental impacts were more frequently reported as negative (with the exception of impacts on direct substitution of GHG emission from fossi fuel). More focused and transparent research is needed to validate these patterns and develop a strong science underpinning for establishing policies and governance agreements that prevent/mitigate negative and promote positvie impacts from bioenergy production.

Item Type: Article
Research Programs: Risk & Resilience (RISK)
Depositing User: IIASA Import
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2016 08:54
Last Modified: 22 Mar 2017 10:48
URI: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/11690

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313